Skip to content
Hugin
Public corpus audit · 12 checks

The case desk audits its own wiring.

A reproducible inspection of every built civic case file. Hard failures stop at IDs and source references; everything else is a review prompt, never an allegation or a completeness claim.

Snapshot

What this run inspected

Built case files1111 distinct IDs declared
Source anchors395checked for use and date posture
Timeline entries273checked for resolvable source wiring
Checks run128 blocker · 4 review
Blockers0structural publication stops
Review prompts22 case files with a prompt
Audit register

Twelve checks, visible by name

Eight checks guard corpus wiring. Four surface editorial questions about source use and date coverage without converting those signals into claims.

  1. Blocker check

    Every declared case builds

    case-build-missing
    Passed0 findings
  2. Blocker check

    Case IDs are unique

    duplicate-case-id
    Passed0 findings
  3. Blocker check

    Source-anchor IDs are unique within each case

    duplicate-source-anchor-id
    Passed0 findings
  4. Blocker check

    Timeline-entry IDs are unique within each case

    duplicate-timeline-entry-id
    Passed0 findings
  5. Blocker check

    Entity IDs are unique within each case

    duplicate-entity-id
    Passed0 findings
  6. Blocker check

    Research-queue IDs are unique within each case

    duplicate-research-queue-id
    Passed0 findings
  7. Blocker check

    Timeline entries carry source references

    timeline-source-reference-empty
    Passed0 findings
  8. Blocker check

    Timeline source references resolve within their case

    timeline-source-reference-dangling
    Passed0 findings
  9. Review check

    Source anchors are connected to timelines or entities

    source-anchor-orphaned
    Review prompt1 finding
  10. Review check

    Dated anchors resolve to document-like URLs

    source-anchor-dated-search-page
    Passed0 findings
  11. Review check

    Interior timeline years are represented

    timeline-interior-year-gap
    Review prompt1 finding
  12. Review check

    Later source dates are reconciled with the timeline

    source-ahead-of-timeline
    Passed0 findings
Publication gate

Blocking findings

0

These findings are limited to missing builds, duplicate identifiers, and timeline source references that are empty or unresolved.

No blocker-class findings were detected by this snapshot's specified checks.

Editorial queue

Review prompts

2

These are questions raised by the current structure. They do not establish that a source is wrong, a record is omitted, or anyone acted improperly.

source anchorsource-anchor-orphaned

Source anchor fdle-epstein-review-2021 is not referenced by a current timeline entry or entity.

  • Source label: FDLE clears PBSO and State Attorney's Office in Epstein plea-deal review.
  • Source URL: https://www.fdle.state.fl.us/regions-divisions/press-office.

Review promptReview whether the anchor should be connected to a record, retained as scoped context, or removed from this case. This signal alone does not show that the source is irrelevant.

Open epstein-public-records
timeline year gaptimeline-interior-year-gap

stock-act-news-correlation has no timeline entries in 2013-2025 between represented years 2012 and 2026.

  • Unrepresented interior years: 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025.

Review promptReview whether the interval reflects the case scope, a quiet period, or records that should be represented. A year gap alone does not establish an omission.

Open stock-act-news-correlation
Coverage ledger

Every case in this audit

Each row links directly to the public case file and carries the exact case-content hash used by this report.

Civic case files included in the integrity audit
Case fileRecordsNewest timeline rowFindingsContent hash
AI Release Receipts Accountability Fileai-release-receipts134 anchors52 timeline rows0 blockers0 review prompts396ebe037062
Boeing 737 MAX Safety Oversight Accountability Fileboeing-faa-safety-oversight18 anchors22 timeline rows0 blockers0 review promptse8fe57534728
Consumer Protection Enforcement Accountability Fileconsumer-protection-enforcement35 anchors25 timeline rows0 blockers0 review promptsac56b3cdfc9d
Cryptocurrency Fraud Enforcement Accountability Filecrypto-fraud-enforcement19 anchors18 timeline rows0 blockers0 review promptsfefe8cafd7e7
Epstein Public Records Accountability Fileepstein-public-records79 anchors71 timeline rows0 blockers1 review prompt1cdbcac94a98
Federal AI Procurement Accountability Filefederal-ai-procurement-watch16 anchors14 timeline rows0 blockers0 review prompts747f6d9a1745
Federal AI Safety Governance Accountability Filefederal-ai-safety-governance21 anchors17 timeline rows0 blockers0 review prompts50c207ecec0e
Federal Improper Payments Oversight Accountability Filegao-federal-improper-payments-fy202517 anchors13 timeline rows0 blockers0 review prompts6f8a74284b3b
Pandemic-Relief Fraud Accountability Filepandemic-relief-fraud-enforcement26 anchors19 timeline rows0 blockers0 review prompts7e0673788fd0
Public Spending Misuse Accountability Filepublic-spending-misuse-review19 anchors15 timeline rows0 blockers0 review promptsca0ef5f50248
STOCK Act News Correlation Accountability Filestock-act-news-correlation11 anchors7 timeline rows0 blockers1 review prompt958e283d0596
Scope note

Methods & limits

A result with no findings means only that the specified structural checks passed at this audited snapshot. It does not mean the corpus is complete, current, or independently verified.

  1. This is a deterministic offline inspection of the built public case-file corpus; it does not fetch or re-read external sources.
  2. Blockers are limited to missing builds, duplicate IDs, and timeline-to-source wiring that is empty or unresolved.
  3. Review findings are prompts to examine source use and date coverage. They are not factual, legal, or misconduct findings.
  4. Source-anchor use is measured only through current timeline and entity sourceAnchorIds.