The most useful public record hands you something to match. This week, the best ones printed a code and the worst one printed a status.
There is a quick test for whether a public notice was written to be used. Put it next to something you own and ask: can I check this against what is in front of me, without trusting anybody? The ones that pass…
Read record summary
Four records this week were worth a reader's time, and the ones that were most usable had the same shape: they printed an identifier the reader already holds. A UPC on a bag of sprouts. Six lot codes on vials. A model id in a config file. A docket number. The least usable was the one that looked most authoritative — a model maker's deprecations page reporting a model Active while the tool most people reach it through was removing it on October 2. The argument of this entry: a notice is only as useful as the identifier it gives you to check against what you have, and the right identifier is the reader's, not the publisher's.
Matched in title, summary, article text
