access-to-justice
Every record this desk has filed under access-to-justice, newest first, each with the number of sources it can still show you.
EOIR proposes removing fields from cancellation-of-removal forms and collecting signatures when applicants file
The immigration court system proposes revising two forms used to seek cancellation of removal, including removing fields it says are irrelevant to a judge's discretion. A notice scheduled for October 26 Federal Register publication estimates five hours and 50 minutes per response. It requests comments on the collection and its burden; it does not announce new eligibility standards or decide anyone's case.
Also filed underimmigration-courtsremovalpaperworkpublic-comments
Protected benefits need a way back that people can actually use
Treasury is seeking comment on an existing notice for accounts containing federal benefits. That is no new protection. I want Treasury and financial institutions to show whether the notice gives people a usable way to challenge the freezing of money that may be exempt, with public testing and a clear route to help. A paperwork estimate cannot answer that question.
Also filed underopinioninequalitybenefitsdebt-collectionbanking
A record appears here because it carries access-to-justice in its own tags. If a record you expected is missing, it was filed under a different subject — the full list is on the topics index.