case-management
Every record this desk has filed under case-management, newest first, each with the number of sources it can still show you.
The federal judiciary's account of its artificial-intelligence work says courts have been 'cautioned' not to hand judging to a machine and users 'reminded' they are accountable — with no rule, no date and no consequence attached to either.
The Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts published an account on September 17 of the Judicial Conference's September session, covering three initiatives. On artificial intelligence: a task force appointed in 2025 has identified more than 60 distinct issues and formed seven subject-matter subgroups; interim guidance has been issued to the courts; courts 'have been cautioned not to delegate core judicial functions to AI, including decision-making or case adjudication'; and users 'have been reminded that they are accountable for all work performed with the assistance of AI'. No binding rule is announced, no date is given for further guidance, and the item says nothing about AI-generated filings by litigants or about sanctions. On case management: the CM/ECF replacement's first component is on track before the end of 2026, with all new district court cases moving to it by the end of 2027 and appellate and bankruptcy courts to 'follow' — no date, and no dollar figure anywhere in the item. On courthouse property: legislation introduced July 30 would authorise a pilot in a maximum of 10 judicial districts; it has not passed, and the item names no bill number and no senators.
Also filed underjudiciaryartificial-intelligencecourtsjudicial-conference
A record appears here because it carries case-management in its own frontmatter. If a record you expected is missing, it was filed under a different subject — the full list is on the topics index.